HMGforum.com

Download/Descarga: site

Thanks a lot Roberto

Best Regards

--

Esgici

Hello Roberto,
Thanks a lot

Thanks a lot Roberto.

thank you! excellent work, Roberto!

Roberto Lopez wrote:Download/Descarga: site

Although, I do not use HMG for development[*] , any new release of HMG always is an significant event for every minigui users and deserves our sincere thanks.

____________________
[*]and i don't plan to be, unless the additional features,
being found in MiniGUI extended, will been adopted and incorporated into HMG
(which could lead to a HMG+MINIGUI ext. re-unification,
something that would be greatly beneficial for the whole project and for the divided mimigui community)

PeteWG wrote: [*]and i don't plan to be, unless the additional features,
being found in MiniGUI extended, will been adopted and incorporated into HMG
(which could lead to a HMG+MINIGUI ext. re-unification,
something that would be greatly beneficial for the whole project and for the divided mimigui community)

As I've already said, I've found some interesting things in minigui ext. that I'd like to add to HMG.

So, I'd like to know your opinion about what minigui ext. things not present in HMG are the most useful for you.

TIA.

Roberto Lopez wrote:As I've already said, I've found some interesting things in minigui ext. that I'd like to add to HMG.
So, I'd like to know your opinion about what minigui ext. things not present in HMG are the most useful for you.
TIA.

I could quote most of the extensions and new features as they're described into
exdiff.txt file, distributed along with Minigui ext. distributions.
However, not every feature contained in-there, is significant for me, but maybe necessary for other minigui users.
(f.e. i don't have any special interest for MDI support or propgrid.lib included in MG-ext, while on the other hand, my apps couldn't live without hbprinter.lib or w/o many of the -ex controls and other commands/functions and enhancements.
So, the problem isn't what "things" I'd prefer to be included into HMG.
My belief is that only a complete source-code alignment (that is, choosing, in case of duplicated elements, to keep the most powerful and enhanced ones and dropping out the others and incorporating the new unique parts, unless something has serious stability problems/bugs in which case could be corrected or even dropped out.
I admit it is a lot of work or even not possible at all, but IMO this must be the direction:
the re-unification of the project, -and that was the meaning of my comment!

(btw, thank you for your tireless efforts and your inspiration..)

---
Pete

PeteWG wrote: <...>
(btw, thank you for your tireless efforts and your inspiration..)

Thanks for your answer.

Gracias Roberto.
Saludos,
Claudio.