HMG vs. Clipper 5.2 speed

Discuss anything else that does not suite other forums.

Moderator: Rathinagiri

Post Reply
User avatar
mol
Posts: 3774
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:31 am
Location: Myszków, Poland
Contact:

HMG vs. Clipper 5.2 speed

Post by mol »

I finished porting my old application written in clipper 5.2

I'm amazing about speed of HMG. It's especially evident when I run it from pendrive.

I am impressed!
User avatar
Rathinagiri
Posts: 5480
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 6:30 pm
DBs Used: MariaDB, SQLite, SQLCipher and MySQL
Location: Sivakasi, India
Contact:

Re: HMG vs. Clipper 5.2 speed

Post by Rathinagiri »

Thanks for sharing the experience. I am also glad.
East or West HMG is the Best.
South or North HMG is worth.
...the possibilities are endless.
User avatar
sudip
Posts: 1456
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:52 am
Location: Kolkata, WB, India

Re: HMG vs. Clipper 5.2 speed

Post by sudip »

Hello Marek,

Thanks a lot for this very interesting topic :-)

Yes, HMG is many times faster. I didn't "convert" any old Clipper app to HMG. But, I converted many old Clipper apps to xHarbour+gtwvw and Harbour+gtwvg. I found amazing improvement of speed in both cases :o , especially with Harbour it's excellent.

I made some add-on projects for my old Clipper and VFP ( ;) ) apps. In both cases I found improvement of speed. I was really surprised when found my HMG add on is faster than VFP!!! :o :D

With best regards.

Sudip
With best regards,
Sudip
User avatar
Vanguarda
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Americana - SP
Contact:

Re: HMG vs. Clipper 5.2 speed

Post by Vanguarda »

Hi friends,

Thanks Mol for sharing this experience with us. It is very interresant

My best regards,
--
Paulo Sérgio Durço (Vanguarda)


http://hmglights.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Roberto Lopez
HMG Founder
Posts: 4012
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:43 pm

Re: HMG vs. Clipper 5.2 speed

Post by Roberto Lopez »

sudip wrote: <...>
HMG add on is faster than VFP!!! :o :D
That is not rare... the last years, VFP become a little fat and slow :)
Regards/Saludos,

Roberto


(Veritas Filia Temporis)
User avatar
nguyenchiduc
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:27 am

Re: HMG vs. Clipper 5.2 speed

Post by nguyenchiduc »

sudip wrote:Hello Marek,

Thanks a lot for this very interesting topic :-)

Yes, HMG is many times faster. I didn't "convert" any old Clipper app to HMG. But, I converted many old Clipper apps to xHarbour+gtwvw and Harbour+gtwvg. I found amazing improvement of speed in both cases :o , especially with Harbour it's excellent.

I made some add-on projects for my old Clipper and VFP ( ;) ) apps. In both cases I found improvement of speed. I was really surprised when found my HMG add on is faster than VFP!!! :o :D

With best regards.

Sudip
I test with a file. Dbf to over 2.200.000 records and about 990M of size.

LOCATE command of HMG and FVP are equivalent. HMG slightly faster

VFP very slow compared to HMG in example

Code: Select all

use data alias data  shared new readonly via "DBFCDX"

DO WHILE .NOT. EOF()

    IF data->user == "ABC"
         /* commands */
         exit
    ELSE
       skip
    ENDIF
ENDDO
EDIT or EDIT EXTEND command in HMG very bad compared to the BROWSE in VFP with large files

====================================

During calculation, the intermediate results show up window can display the error. Although the program still run. This affects only the display but not the program crashes
User avatar
sudip
Posts: 1456
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:52 am
Location: Kolkata, WB, India

Re: HMG vs. Clipper 5.2 speed

Post by sudip »

Hi All,

Very recently I was creating some reports with DBF (you may call it as "add on" project) for my old VFP app (writtein with VfP6, which has problems with Win7).

I couldn't check the exact time. But, as per my observation.
1. VFP's (VFP 6) embedded SQL is very fast.
2. HMG app is more flexible and robust.
3. Exporting data to Excel (OLE) is faster with HMG :)

I was also testing very small project with VB.Net 2010 Express Edition with a small table. User interface is outstanding, but it's very slow.
With best regards,
Sudip
Post Reply